There are numerous definitions of religion and only a few are stated
here. The typical dictionary definition of religion refers to a "belief
in, or the worship of, a god or gods"[17] or the "service and worship of God or the supernatural".[18] However, many writers and scholars[who?] have noted that this basic 'belief in god' definition fails to capture the diversity of religious thought and experience.[citation needed] Edward Burnett Tylor defined religion as simply "the belief in spiritual beings".[19] He argued, back in 1871, that narrowing the definition to mean the belief in a supreme deity or judgment after death or idolatry
and so on, would exclude many peoples from the category of religious,
and thus "has the fault of identifying religion rather with particular
developments than with the deeper motive which underlies them". He also
argued that the belief in spiritual beings exists in all known
societies.
The anthropologist Clifford Geertz
defined religion as a "system of symbols which acts to establish
powerful, pervasive, and long-lasting moods and motivations in men by
formulating conceptions of a general order of existence and clothing
these conceptions with such an aura of factuality that the moods and
motivations seem uniquely realistic.[20] Alluding perhaps to Tylor's
"deeper motive", Geertz remarked that "we have very little idea of how,
in empirical terms, this particular miracle is accomplished. We just
know that it is done, annually, weekly, daily, for some people almost
hourly; and we have an enormous ethnographic literature to demonstrate
it".[21] The theologian Antoine Vergote
also emphasized the "cultural reality" of religion, which he defined as
"the entirety of the linguistic expressions, emotions and, actions and
signs that refer to a supernatural being or supernatural beings"; he
took the term "supernatural" simply to mean whatever transcends the
powers of nature or human agency.[22]
The sociologist Durkheim, in his seminal book The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life, defined religion as a "unified system of beliefs and practices relative to sacred things".[23]
By sacred things he meant things "set apart and forbidden — beliefs and
practices which unite into one single moral community called a Church,
all those who adhere to them". Sacred things are not, however, limited
to gods or spirits.[note 2]
On the contrary, a sacred thing can be "a rock, a tree, a spring, a
pebble, a piece of wood, a house, in a word, anything can be sacred".[24]
Religious beliefs, myths, dogmas and legends are the representations
that express the nature of these sacred things, and the virtues and
powers which are attributed to them.[25]
In his book The Varieties of Religious Experience, the psychologist William James
defined religion as "the feelings, acts, and experiences of individual
men in their solitude, so far as they apprehend themselves to stand in
relation to whatever they may consider the divine".[26] By the term "divine" James meant "any object that is godlike, whether it be a concrete deity or not"[27] to which the individual feels impelled to respond with solemnity and gravity.[28]
Echoes of James' and Durkheim's definitions are to be found in the writings of, for example, Frederick Ferré who defined religion as "one's way of valuing most comprehensively and intensively".[29] Similarly, for the theologian Paul Tillich, faith is "the state of being ultimately concerned",[30] which "is itself religion. Religion is the substance, the ground, and the depth of man's spiritual life."[31]
When religion is seen in terms of "sacred", "divine", intensive
"valuing", or "ultimate concern", then it is possible to understand why
scientific findings and philosophical criticisms (e.g. Richard Dawkins) do not necessarily disturb its adherents
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar